Why Treatment Assignment and Potential Outcomes Are Not Independent in Observational Studies ?
Step-by-Step Explanation:
1. What Are Potential Outcomes?
-
In causal inference, for each individual we define two potential outcomes:
-
: the outcome the person would have if they did not receive the treatment.
-
: the outcome the person would have if they did receive the treatment.
-
📌 These are hypothetical — for each person, we only get to observe one of them in real life (depending on their treatment assignment).
2. What Is ?
-
is the treatment assignment:
-
: treated
-
: control (not treated)
-
3. What Does "Not Independent" Mean?
-
Saying that the potential outcomes are not independent means:
The likelihood of receiving treatment depends on something that also affects the outcome.
In math:
That is: the treatment assignment is related to the outcome you’d have had with or without treatment.
4. 🔄 Why Is This a Problem?
In randomized experiments, treatment is assigned randomly, so:
That’s good — it means treatment is not confounded with outcome.
But in an observational study, people choose treatment (or are selected for it) based on characteristics like:
-
Age
-
Disease severity
-
Socioeconomic status
-
etc.
Those same characteristics may also affect outcomes — so there's confounding.
🧠Example:
-
Sicker patients are more likely to get an aggressive treatment.
-
But sicker patients also tend to have worse outcomes, even if the treatment is effective.
-
So if we just compare outcomes in treated vs. untreated, we confuse the effect of treatment with the effect of baseline health.
🔑 Why It Matters
If potential outcomes and treatment assignment are not independent, then naïvely comparing treated vs. untreated will give a biased estimate of the treatment effect.
This is the fundamental challenge of causal inference in observational data.
🧪 What Can We Do?
To deal with this lack of independence, methods like:
-
Propensity score matching / weighting / stratification
-
Regression adjustment
-
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)
-
Targeted maximum likelihood (TMLE)
-
Instrumental variables
are used to simulate a situation as close as possible to randomization by adjusting for confounders.
✅ Summary in Plain Language
In a randomized trial, treatment is random — it has nothing to do with what the outcome would have been.
But in an observational study, people who get treated are systematically different from those who don't.
As a result, treatment assignment and potential outcomes are not independent, and this creates bias in estimating the true causal effect.
Comments
Post a Comment